- Should you use Entity Framework?
- Is Entity Framework faster than ado net?
- Why stored procedure are used?
- What is the use of DbContext in Entity Framework?
- Which one is faster function or stored procedure?
- Is stored procedure faster than query?
- Is Entity Framework slow?
- Can we call a stored procedure inside a function?
- What is difference between stored procedure and function?
- Does stored procedure increase performance?
- Are stored procedures still used?
- Is Dapper faster than Entity Framework?
- What are the disadvantages of Entity Framework?
- Is Ado net still used?
- Is Dapper faster than ado net?
Should you use Entity Framework?
EF should be considered a great ORM framework which allows faster development, easier and quicker operations to the DB, as long as you are careful and know how it works in order to avoid certain mistakes and create performance problems..
Is Entity Framework faster than ado net?
If you are asking about performance then ADO.NET will always be faster then Entity framework. The difference is not much when using EF 6 but ado.net is still faster. If looking at ease of convenience then Entity framework is better since it allows you to work with data as strongly typed objects in C#.
Why stored procedure are used?
Stored procedures provide improved performance because fewer calls need to be sent to the database. For example, if a stored procedure has four SQL statements in the code, then there only needs to be a single call to the database instead of four calls for each individual SQL statement.
What is the use of DbContext in Entity Framework?
DbContext explained The DbContext is an integral component of the Entity Framework that represents a connection session with the database. You can take advantage of the DbContext to query data into your entities or save your entities to the underlying database.
Which one is faster function or stored procedure?
There is no difference in speed between a query run inside a function and one run inside a procedure. Stored procedures have problems aggregating results, they cannot be composed with other stored procedures. … Anything that manipulates data must be a procedure.
Is stored procedure faster than query?
Each and every time a query is submitted, it has to run through the procedure of finding the execulation plan. Stored procedure on the other hand should be faster because the execution plan can be created and cached the moment the procedure is added or run for the first time is the assumption.
Is Entity Framework slow?
The fact of the matter is that products such as Entity Framework will ALWAYS be slow and inefficient, because they are executing lot more code. … Remove layers such as LINQ, EF and others, and your code will run efficiently, will scale, and yes, it will still be easy to maintain. Too much abstraction is a bad ‘pattern’.
Can we call a stored procedure inside a function?
You cannot execute a stored procedure inside a function, because a function is not allowed to modify database state, and stored procedures are allowed to modify database state. … Therefore, it is not allowed to execute a stored procedure from within a function.
What is difference between stored procedure and function?
The function must return a value but in Stored Procedure it is optional. Even a procedure can return zero or n values. Functions can have only input parameters for it whereas Procedures can have input or output parameters. Functions can be called from Procedure whereas Procedures cannot be called from a Function.
Does stored procedure increase performance?
Stored procedures improve database performance as they allow cached query plans to be reused. … In the absence of parameterized query plans, SQL server automatically detects parameters and generates cached query plans resulting in improved performance.
Are stored procedures still used?
Stored procedures have been falling out of favour for several years now. The preferred approach these days for accessing a relational database is via an O/R mapper such as NHibernate or Entity Framework. Stored procedures require much more work to develop and maintain.
Is Dapper faster than Entity Framework?
As Dapper does very basic job, it is faster; but you have to write more code. As EF does much more than that, it is (bit) slower; but you have to write less code.
What are the disadvantages of Entity Framework?
Disadvantages of Entity FrameworkLazy loading is the main drawbacks of EF.Its syntax is complicated.Its logical schema is not able to understand business entities and relation among each other.Logical schema of database is not capable of using certain parts of application.It is not available for every RDMS.Need to handle data in nontraditional way.More items…•
Is Ado net still used?
So yes: there’s definitely still room for “classic” ADO.NET to “fill the gaps” where EF/L2S or other technologies don’t really offer anything useful. Older applications still use classic ADO.Net.
Is Dapper faster than ado net?
In short, Dapper.NET is unquestionably faster than EF and slightly faster than straight ADO.NET, but we’ll be doing the majority of development in EF and then optimizing with Dapper.NET where needed.